ARTICLES
Q TALKS
DISCOVER Q
EVENTS
All Q Events
Q Nashville 2014
Q Session | Innovate
Q Cast
RESOURCES
Books
Studies
Bible
Church Leaders
Speaking
PARTICIPATE
Praxis Accelerator
Host Conversations
Church
Business
Education
Social Sector
Arts + Entertainment
Science + Tech
Government
Media
Cities
Gospel
Restorers
Tweet
8
Science + Tech
Our Nomadic Existence: How Electronic Culture Shapes Community
by
Shane Hipps
It sounds almost too obvious to say at this point, but personal, face-toface connections have an immeasurable impact on how we establish, build, and maintain relationships. While most of us know this already, it’s amazing how few of us practice it. The experience of virtual community can feel just as real as physical community, but the social, spiritual, and emotional realities do not provide the same kind of connections. This means that we must be discerning about the way we use information technologies to make decisions or build and maintain relationships in the church. We must ask how our media change personal interactions. We need to consider the message conveyed when we choose an e-mail or text message over a personal visit, phone call, or handwritten note. These may seem like mundane questions, but they help generate an awareness of the forces that unravel community.
Most importantly, we must recognize our unconscious tendency to be seduced by our virtual communities so that we can use them more intentionally rather than be used by them. Our subtle addiction to electronic community is not like an addiction to drugs, where the only solution is to stop using entirely. It is more like an addiction to food or money, where we must learn to regain power over something we cannot do without. On occasion, we may consider fasting from certain media or technologies as a spiritual discipline. This can be a very effective way to help us perceive media’s power and recalibrate our psyches. Ultimately, we must develop healthy relationships with our technologies. This means nurturing a conscious awareness of their power, our longings, and the way they both shape us, our faith, and our communities.
WHAT DOESN’T BEND, BREAKS
I was 10 years old when I met William Lo. He was a 60-year-old Chinese man and friend of my father. During his visits he would stay with us. I remember waking up every morning and looking out the window to see our Chinese friend in the backyard performing what looked like a slow-motion dance. He would sway and lean as though responding to the wind. His arms would trace controlled arcs in circular movements through the air. I later learned he was a master of an ancient martial art called tai chi and had been performing this two-hour ritual every morning for the last 40 years.
Every now and then, William would teach me a few simple techniques. The one I remember most vividly was how to respond if someone tried to push me. First he modeled the way by inviting me to push him as hard as I could. Eager to play and learn, I backed up and ran straight at him, throwing all my 10-year-old strength into his chest, only to find myself facedown on the ground behind him. It was as though I had traveled right through him.
As I got up, he said, “Now I’m going to push you lightly. Try to resist me with all your strength.” I stood my ground as he offered a gentle nudge. The next thing I knew, I was on the ground again. At this point he shared his secret knowledge: “When someone pushes you,” he said, “do not resist the force, or it will overtake you. Instead you must understand the force and cooperate with it. Only then will you disarm it.” That day William taught me how to relax my upper body in such a way as to absorb and deflect the momentum of an outside force. I learned that whatever doesn’t bend, breaks. It was a remarkably effective technique that even worked to disarm a schoolyard bully later that year.
William Lo’s wise counsel is also appropriate advice as we seek ways to respond to the forces of electronic culture. Instead of simply resisting, critiquing, or uncritically embracing cultural forces, we are first invited to study and understand them. Only then will we learn to use them, rather than be used by them. Only then will we regain our equilibrium and anticipate the powers that shape us.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Marshall McLuhan’s seminal idea was that the medium is the message. What are some common examples of media you use and how do they shape the messages that they communicate?
2. McLuhan’s Laws of Media are actually questions that help us evaluate the effects of a new medium or technology. Use these questions from pages 4-5 to evaluate a current technology, such as surveillance cameras or social networking websites.
3. Shane Hipps lists several paradoxical consequences of electronic culture: we become a tribe of individuals, we feel empathy at a distance, and we experience intimate anonymity. What are some ways you see these three phenomena in your church or neighborhood? What about in your own life?
4. How often do you participate in “virtual community” or write or read blogs on the Internet? How do you respond to the dangers presented here regarding the effects of these on genuine community?
5. What technologies or forms of media does your community of faith currently use that need to be evaluated?
6. Fasting from certain technologies or media for a time can help us “recalibrate our psyches.” What technology should you consider fasting from and why?
END NOTES
1 W. Terrence Gordon,
Marshall McLuhan: Escape into Understanding: A Biography
(Toronto: Stoddart, 1997), 226.
2 W. Terrence Gordon,
McLuhan for Beginners
(New York: Writers and Readers, 1997), 2
3 Marshall McLuhan,
Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man,
1st MIT Press ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994), x.
4 Marshall McLuhan and Eric McLuhan,
Laws of Media: The New Science
(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988), 93.
5 Ibid., 239.
6 Mark Lau Branson,
“Forming God’s People,”
Congregations, Vol. 29 (Winter 2003): 22-27.
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
Tweet
Comments
Eric Brown
"You can't change the methods without changing the message." So true...
Joe
There are 2 aspects here: 1) worldly/flesh; and 2) spirit/Trinitarian.
On the deep, spiritual level, the truth is the word, the medium is the Trinity, with the Holy Spirit being "the medium." The truth/word never changes, but the meaning and depth of understanding changes as we mature spiritually (towards the Divine connection). If Christians really understand and live this, the worldly media/medium won't have a deep lasting effect, and the "programming" effect of advertising is minimal as we focus on God. We then look at the world around us in a MUCH different way. The worldly methods and message will change, but the truth never does - it's nice to know in a crazy world there is that one Constant!!
L.L. Barkat
"When you tap into the most intense or emotionally poignant experiences, you discover the trigger for all consumer impulses. "
Just that. So fascinating.
When we act as consumers, then, what are we doing? Is it perhaps a form of spiritual experience, as we perhaps try to tap into, or alter, our own psyches through action?
Edward van Vliet
of course, this year edmonton, aberta (canada) is celebrating his centenary so there's been a lot of mcluhanery going on here. An interesting collection of essays exploring his throught and its connection to his own theological positioning can be found at gingko press (which publishes a number of books about mcluhan - love the carson collaboration, the book of probes) or here:
http://www.amazon.com/Medium-Light-Reflections-Religion/dp/1606089927/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1318874261&sr=1-1
Curtis
There's a potent irony to each of us who are posting replies here because we "connected" with this excellent article.
Today is the very last day of my 3 month sabbatical - my first in 22 years of ministry. One month was spent in the DR Congo; a week in the intensely crowded streets of Kinshasa and the rest in rural villages. So for that time I was the fish who was plucked out of my technological fish tank and experienced something very different. Although I believed myself to be reasonably well connected to people here in Portland OR, the intensity of constant connection in the Congo was at first exhausting. In Kinshasa, a city of almost 12 million people, everyone is so amazingly linked. You walk amidst endless crowds on jammed streets, or ride in mini-vans with more than 20 people stacked on wooden benches. And people talk! Boy do they talk. On those mini-van busses, conversations among strangers are unceasing. "Where are you going? What are you doing today? Where did you get that? Do you know how to get to...?" You buy your daily bread, your vegetables, and change your money right on the street from people you see everyday. People ask about every detail of life, regularly. You either interact and rely on people, or you don't survive. Literally.
In the villages it was much different - the crowds are missing - but the connections are much the same. With anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand people in a village, you are known and your family is know. It's likely that families have stayed in the same village for generations, and the stories of families are known as well. I've been reading about African culture and came across this from John Mbitit, a Kenyan theologian: He writes this about African culture:
"Whatever happens to the individual happens to the whole group, and whatever happens to the whole group happens to the individual. The individual can only say: 'I am, because we are; and since we are, therefore I am.' This is a cardinal point in the understanding of the African view of man"
I read these words before my trip and they were interesting. After visiting, though, they took on new depth.
Since I've returned to the states and my techno-centric life, a heavy loneliness has swept over me. I am so deeply disconnected and I'm very much looking forward to going back to my church (tomorrow!). I'm not overly giddy about getting back to work (shh, don't tell), but I miss people so much. The time in Africa taught me how we have gotten so accustomed to living in relationally impoverished patterns, that we don't even feel the loss.
Mike
There are a lot of great thoughts here, but I most enjoyed the introduction. I have often felt that the religion of our time is Consumerism.
In the past, religion has always answered the question of how to get god or the gods to give us what we want. Now there's no need for that answer. To get what we want, we just reach out and swipe or we click here. No wonder the question of God's existence has changed to God's significance.
Michael H
"“The methods change, but the message stays the same.” There it is — the rallying cry of the evangelical church..."
Aha, the Evangelical Thing. Been there, done that, read Bible, came home to the Catholic Church, sigh of relief.
However, Christianity is not medium versus message, it's the communication of both a message and simultaneously the Thing it refers to. The Presence of God says "I am present". Most of The West has subtly changed this "message" and hence the methods have changed.
Brad Waller
Praise God! Marshall McLuhan is being rediscovered, but in a more up-to-date and Christian context. Shane Hipps' excellent article does great service toward protecting and maintaining "authentic" Christian community.
Comments are now closed
ALSO BY SHANE HIPPS
The Spirituality of the Cell Phone
Science + Tech
Electronic Culture and Spirituality
Science + Tech
ALSO IN SCIENCE + TECH
Keep Calm and Fight the Cylons
by Robert Joustra
Spreading the Good News
by Jimmy Lin
The Bible In a Technological Age
by Bobby Gruenewald