ARTICLES
Q TALKS
DISCOVER Q
EVENTS
All Q Events
Q Nashville 2014
Q Session | Innovate
Q Cast
RESOURCES
Books
Studies
Bible
Church Leaders
Speaking
PARTICIPATE
Praxis Accelerator
Host Conversations
Church
Business
Education
Social Sector
Arts + Entertainment
Science + Tech
Government
Media
Cities
Gospel
Restorers
Tweet
Media
MTV and the Future of Music Media
by
Brett McCracken
Looks like MTV is back in the music video business. After a steady abandonment of the very form it created, in recent years it has looked as though MTV had officially ceded the music video future to YouTube. But in November it was announced that MTV was not only not quitting music videos, but that they were going to start creating them.
With
LCD Soundsystem’s “Pow Pow” video
—a big budget spectacle starring Anna Kendrick and funded by MTV—the network that killed the radio star has opted back in to the business of making video stars, in a more direct way than ever.
[Watch the first music video to air on MTV:
"Video Killed the Radio Star"
]
New York Magazine
has an
interesting summary
of the venture: "It’s the kind of music video you have to watch more than once to really understand, the kind of esoteric, expensive-looking clip you used to see all the time on MTV but haven’t in years. Now, though, the network hopes to bring back the ambitious music video—and since the record companies aren’t paying for them anymore, MTV is going to finance them itself."
One of the things that interests me about this news is that it represents the broader trend in the world of distribution toward content production rather than just content providing. In a world where distribution platforms are relatively cheap, easy and a dime a dozen, the question is not so much one of how to get content to audiences as much as whether there’s enough content to fill the unlimited channels that exist. Thus, the emphasis is on creating enough content—and enough good content—to keep people active on your platform. It’s one thing for
Hulu
to exist. It’s another for it to have enough attractive, exclusive content to keep people coming back. Distribution companies have vested interest in both quantity and quality of content; their brand reputation and relationship with consumers depends on it.
Back in the 80s, MTV started mainly as a middle-man distribution platform—where record companies could get their artists’ music in front of the eyes, via cool and colorful videos, of huge numbers of consumer teenagers. As MTV’s popularity grew, and with it the popularity of the music video form, the network realized the power of niche content for advertising revenue. With an edgy reputation and a corner on a very specific youth market, MTV began creating original, non-music programming (e.g., The Real World; Beavis and Butthead), which proved even more popular than videos. They were no longer MTV the platform for the other companies’ content; they were MTV the content-producing brand.
It’s a classic monopolistic move in the entertainment industry: Why control only distribution if you can vertically integrate and control production and distribution both? More control almost always means more money.
Over time, MTV original content crowded out pretty much everything else, and music was mostly replaced by shows about snobby teen girls and product placement run amuk. It was simple economics. A schedule packed with reality shows attracted more eyeballs than one packed with music videos. But what happened after the debut of YouTube? Music video distribution got a new, non-MTV shot in the arm. Suddenly artists—even indie, little-known artists who would never have been played on MTV anyway—had a free platform to showcase their work to millions of people. And the music video became popular again. Lady Gaga’s eye-grabbing videos now rack up hundreds of millions of views on YouTube, and MTV wants back in the game.
[Read
Inc.
magazine's 2010 article,
"The Future of Music Videos"
]
So, what does MTV have to offer? Taste? No, not really. MTV lost its reputation as tastemaker during the TRL-era. Are they a trusted source for introducing the world to great new artists? Not anymore. That mantle has passed to music bloggers and e-zines like
Paste
and
Pitchfork
.
MTV will likely be making music videos that reflect exactly what they’ve become: A conglomerate-era corporate brand with big pockets, advertising power and star-making potential. The music video has always been a hybrid form, but the types of videos MTV will produce will be even more so. They will combine song, celebrity, spectacle, and cross promotion in efforts to produce “supervideos” like only MTV can. Or at least that’s what they should be doing.
What will engender MTV to the music-loving community once again? Perhaps a willingness to play patron to lesser known artists like LCD Soundsystem, who could never compete with Gaga-levels of video spectacle or star power on their own. MTV has the goods to be a philanthropic folk hero of the music video renaissance. And in the goodwill gift economy, where brand viability often hinges on brand generosity and experience marketing, being a philanthropic folk hero isn't a bad thing to be.
-----
Are music videos both the past and future of music media? Where do you go to discover new music?
Tweet
Comments
Drew Wagner
Music will always be around, and seeing all younger generations growing up surrounded by screens, the music video will probably continue. As this article points out, however, it must be about more than simply making a video for a song. This could be a good venture for MTV, most particularly because they can provide the celebrity power to a video no one else could, and we are still very enmeshed in a celebrity driven culture.
I tend to discover all of my new music on Pandora.com, the online radio, or from suggestions by friends and family. I doubt I've ever discovered new quality music on MTV. However, if this move does take them toward showcasing young talented music groups that have a following but not necessarily stardom, they will regain respect by being a company supporting the underdog.
Stepping back from this specific situation and thinking about media content in general (regarding distribution platforms ability to host seemingly infinite content), it seems like the information age is about to destroy itself. The internet has allowed us to find (or provide) endless, accessible information to anyone and everyone. Thus, the problem becomes not about information, but what information is right and who can understand it. The content is useless if it is bad content (including poorly presented information, or flat-out misinformation), or if it's so sophisticated no one can interpret it. Today, since endless information distribution has made room for really bad content, we need professionals to interpret information for us, explaining the value of highly educated and intelligent people. It seems we are moving to a time where those good interpreters are doing something to leave the bad content in the dark, and only shine light on the good content in such a way it is understandable to an average Joe. This, it seems to me, is the point of Gabe Lyon's work on this very site. It will be interesting to see if good interpreters can keep up with the endlessly surmounting speed of communication and quantity of information.
Aaron Brown
I think that the music video is here to stay. They are featured on music television stations and youtube videos. If I want to hear a song, I don't buy it off iTunes...I go to youtube and see if someone has uploaded it as a video and I listen there before I make my purchasing decisions. I think that youtube has simply allowed the listener the ability to create their own music videos and put their own artistic spin on a video.
If I want to discover new music, I simply see what my music maven friends are listening to. I don't spend a lot of time searching for new stuff, but they do, and I'm okay with them doing all the leg-work. I work at a major university in the mid-west and it is great to have college students who can keep me in the loop with what is hot.
After perusing the new video produced by MTV, I think it will be interesting to see how this generation responds to the storyline/artistic expression. The video is set in a common, easy to identify setting for the viewer, but the storyline is quizzical with the free-mason symbol, etc. I wonder if this generation has the attention span to watch several times to attempt to understand the plot or if the art will simply be lost on them. I lean toward the former, in that this generation seems to be curious and smarter than older generations give them credit.
Michael Labay
Lady GaGa, "The Mechanical Bride": Sex and Motorcycles
http://books.google.com/books?id=UUMoGmujREwC&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&dq=Essential+McLuhan+The+Mechanical+Bride&source=bl&ots=2DZYOw_a1Q&sig=eMLKKce3Jd_uzb11xMLWF8GFg5M&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false
patrick beard
I was a videotape operator for MTV from 1991 to 2000. This was when music videos slowly started to fade away from MTV. We in the studio enjoyed working on vj segments,specialty shows and eventually MTV Live and TRL. It was a fun time and also a busy time. All the people I wprked with had to find other jobs when TRL went off the air. I decided to get out of the TV business. I hope MTV goes back to the way it was, not just for the viewers, but the people they employed in the studio.
Comments are now closed
ALSO BY BRETT MCCRACKEN
Truth is Elusive and Memory Fickle, but Love Wins: A Look at the 2012 Oscar Films
Arts + Entertainment
9 Attributes of a Cultured Christian
Arts + Entertainment
Ten Most Transcendent Films of the Last Decade
Arts + Entertainment
ALSO IN MEDIA
The Book Industry is Fine
by Josh Reinders
Media, Faith, & Politics
by Michael Cromartie and Ross Douthat
What Should You Read in 2012?
by Alissa Wilkinson